This article is the stupidest thing I’ve ever read. Not the law - although it’s easy to have doubts when the National Trust are prosecuted for letting one of their six million trees fall down - it’s the terrible journalism. What this article really says is… send your employees go-karting and if one of them is killed your company will be fined millions of pounds. This is rubbish, and ignores the legislation completely. Can it really be said that if you book your employees a day out with a respectable outdoor pursuits company - and maybe even double check that they’re insured and have a health & safety policy - and someone is killed that the company is guilty of a gross breach of its duty of care? Will any juries really come to this conclusion? No. The article is really a disguised advert for Croner Consulting, so that they can sell Health & Safety solutions to panicked employers. In fact, it’s a bit like this other Times article which is a scare-mongering disguised advert for Peninsula, a similar company. It contains at least one legal error - can you spot it? I used to like the Times, but some of their recent articles make me want to vomit.
Search
Latest Posts
RSS- Annual Limits Increase details released
- Equality Bill will tackle Lewisham v Malcolm
- But I don’t want to sack him…
- Agency workers gain employment rights
- Tips and the Minimum Wage
- Sick pay and benefits shake-up
- Proposition 8 - banning gay marriage in California
- Age discrimination in redundancy selection - LIFO and length of service
- Severe disfigurements
- Flexible working turnaround?
Category List
- Absence (2)
- Compromise Agreements (2)
- Constructive Dismissal (3)
- Contracts of Employment (8)
- Disciplinary (10)
- Discrimination (43)
- Dispute Resolution regulations (3)
- Employment Tribunal (19)
- Family Friendly Rights (4)
- Garden Leave (2)
- Grievance (1)
- Health & Safety (3)
- Lawyers (11)
- Limitation Periods (2)
- National Minimum Wage (7)
- Podcasts (1)
- Rambling (25)
- Redundancy (3)
- Remedies (3)
- Retirement (3)
- Solicitors (10)
- Status (4)
- Trade Unions (2)
- TUPE (3)
- Unfair Dismissal (19)
- Usefully Employed (12)
- Working Time Regulations (5)
Links
Latest EAT Judgments
RSS- Royal Mail Group Ltd v Communication Workers Union [2008] UKEAT 0338_08_0212 (2 December 2008)
- Bath Spa Experience (t/a Il Toco D'italia) v. Lamarina [2008] UKEAT 0144_08_2411 (24 November 2008)
- Mauritius Tourism Promotion Authority v. Min [2008] UKEAT 0185_08_2411 (24 November 2008)
- Eweida v British Airways Plc [2008] UKEAT 0123_08_2011 (20 November 2008)
- Blue Chip Trading Ltd v Helbawi [2008] UKEAT 0397_08_2011 (20 November 2008)
- E-Zec Medical Transport Service Ltd v.Gregory [2008] UKEAT 0192_08_1411 (14 November 2008)
- Tradition Securities & Futures SA & Anor v Times Newspapers Ltd & Ors [2008] UKEAT 1415_08_1011 (10 November 2008)
- City & County of Swansea v Honey [2008] UKEAT 0030_08_0711 (7 November 2008)
- Telindus Ltd v Brading [2008] UKEAT 0143_08_0711 (7 November 2008)
- Arnold & Ors v Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council [2008] UKEAT 0332_08_0611 (6 November 2008)

Usefully Employed - employment law blog by Usefully Employed is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 UK: England & Wales License.
Based on a work at blog.usefullyemployed.co.uk.







0 Responses to “Timber!”
Leave a Reply