This article is the stupidest thing I’ve ever read. Not the law - although it’s easy to have doubts when the National Trust are prosecuted for letting one of their six million trees fall down - it’s the terrible journalism. What this article really says is… send your employees go-karting and if one of them is killed your company will be fined millions of pounds. This is rubbish, and ignores the legislation completely. Can it really be said that if you book your employees a day out with a respectable outdoor pursuits company - and maybe even double check that they’re insured and have a health & safety policy - and someone is killed that the company is guilty of a gross breach of its duty of care? Will any juries really come to this conclusion? No. The article is really a disguised advert for Croner Consulting, so that they can sell Health & Safety solutions to panicked employers. In fact, it’s a bit like this other Times article which is a scare-mongering disguised advert for Peninsula, a similar company. It contains at least one legal error - can you spot it? I used to like the Times, but some of their recent articles make me want to vomit.
Search
Latest Posts
RSS- Working time opt-out at death’s door once more
- Court of Appeal rules homophobic harrassment not dependent on perceived sexuality
- BNP Membership - employment law aspects
- Islington successfully appeals Ladele - religious beliefs do not trump social equality
- Annual Limits Increase details released
- Equality Bill will tackle Lewisham v Malcolm
- But I don’t want to sack him…
- Agency workers gain employment rights
- Tips and the Minimum Wage
- Sick pay and benefits shake-up
Category List
- Absence (2)
- Compromise Agreements (2)
- Constructive Dismissal (3)
- Contracts of Employment (9)
- Disciplinary (10)
- Discrimination (46)
- Dispute Resolution regulations (3)
- Employment Tribunal (19)
- Family Friendly Rights (4)
- Garden Leave (2)
- Grievance (1)
- Health & Safety (3)
- Lawyers (11)
- Limitation Periods (2)
- National Minimum Wage (7)
- Podcasts (1)
- Rambling (26)
- Redundancy (3)
- Remedies (3)
- Retirement (3)
- Solicitors (10)
- Status (4)
- Trade Unions (2)
- TUPE (3)
- Unfair Dismissal (19)
- Usefully Employed (12)
- Working Time Regulations (6)
Links
Latest EAT Judgments
RSS- Wilson v Health & Safety Executive [2008] UKEAT 0050_08_1912 (19 December 2008)
- Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes [2008] UKEAT 0063_08_1912 (19 December 2008)
- London Borough of Islington v Ladele [2008] UKEAT 0453_08_1912 (19 December 2008)
- North Cumbria Acute Hospitals NHS Trust v Potter & Ors [2008] UKEAT 0121_07_1812 (18 December 2008)
- Eydatoulah v Brighton & Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust [2008] UKEAT 0583_07_1812 (18 December 2008)
- HM Land Registry v Wakefield [2008] UKEAT 0530_08_1712 (17 December 2008)
- Brennan & Ors v Sunderland City Council Unison GMB [2008] UKEAT 0349_08_1612 (16 December 2008)
- Aziz-Mir v Sainsbury's Supermarkets Plc [2008] UKEAT 0415_07_1012 (10 December 2008)
- F & C Asset Management Plc & Ors v Switalski [2008] UKEAT 0423_08_0912 (9 December 2008)
- Noor v Home Office (Border & Immigration Agency) [2008] UKEAT 0252_08_0312 (3 December 2008)

Usefully Employed - employment law blog by Usefully Employed is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 UK: England & Wales License.
Based on a work at blog.usefullyemployed.co.uk.







0 Responses to “Timber!”
Leave a Reply