<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Logan&#8217;s Run</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.usefullyemployed.co.uk/2007/12/07/logans-run/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.usefullyemployed.co.uk/2007/12/07/logans-run/</link>
	<description>An Employment Law Blog by a UK barrister</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: AG&#8217;s opinion on Age Discrimination and Retirement released at Usefully Employed</title>
		<link>http://blog.usefullyemployed.co.uk/2007/12/07/logans-run/#comment-993</link>
		<dc:creator>AG&#8217;s opinion on Age Discrimination and Retirement released at Usefully Employed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usefullyemployed.co.uk/2007/12/07/logans-run/#comment-993</guid>
		<description>[...] A retirement dismissal is accomplished simply by following a statutory procedure, which in effect is giving the employee six months notice and hearing any request to continue working beyond the retirement date. The net effect, however, is that provided the procedure is followed a 65 year old employee can be fairly dismissed solely on that basis. I have made my views about this clear here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A retirement dismissal is accomplished simply by following a statutory procedure, which in effect is giving the employee six months notice and hearing any request to continue working beyond the retirement date. The net effect, however, is that provided the procedure is followed a 65 year old employee can be fairly dismissed solely on that basis. I have made my views about this clear here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
