The Times reports that Pinsent Masons is the first law firm to enter Stonewall’s Workplace Equality Index - meaning that it is one of the top 100 employers for gay people. I actually suspect that homophobic discrimination is fairly low in large law firms, and that Pinsents’ placing is more down to a joint initiative between HR & PR than a real representation of different quality of life working there. Money is king in these arenas, and the complete disregard shown for solicitors’ personal life doesn’t depend on who he or she chooses to spend it with. Certainly in my experience a firm will let you get away with any number of personal attributes (positive or otherwise) if you rack up enough hours every month. But similarly, law firms are not the sort of businesses that need to emphasise their diversity policies in order to attract diverse candidates - law has rapidly turned into a profession where women and ethnic and sexual minorities are represented in huge numbers. The lack of these people in senior positions and the judiciary is symptomatic of that rapidity set against the time needed to reach seniority, rather than any glass ceiling.
Search
Latest Posts
RSS- Extension of contractual entitlements into Additional Maternity Leave
- On-call time - Minimum Wage & Working Time Regulations
- Delay in judgments
- Muslim alcohol handling discrimination claim hits Tesco
- National Minimum Wage increases come into force
- AG’s opinion on Age Discrimination and Retirement released
- Director / shareholder status claims stayed
- Muslim worker claims discrimination over “terrorist” birthday card
- Replacement for Training Contracts unveiled
- Imposing annual leave during a notice period
Category List
- Absence (1)
- Compromise Agreements (2)
- Constructive Dismissal (3)
- Contracts of Employment (6)
- Disciplinary (8)
- Discrimination (37)
- Dispute Resolution regulations (3)
- Employment Tribunal (16)
- Family Friendly Rights (4)
- Garden Leave (2)
- Grievance (1)
- Health & Safety (3)
- Lawyers (11)
- Limitation Periods (2)
- National Minimum Wage (6)
- Podcasts (1)
- Rambling (22)
- Redundancy (2)
- Remedies (2)
- Retirement (2)
- Solicitors (10)
- Status (4)
- Trade Unions (2)
- TUPE (3)
- Uncategorized (4)
- Unfair Dismissal (16)
- Usefully Employed (12)
- Working Time Regulations (5)
Links
Latest EAT Judgments
RSS- Redrow Homes (Yorkshire) Ltd v Buckborough & Anor [2008] UKEAT 0528_07_1010 (10 October 2008)
- Aylesford School v Grosvenor [2008] UKEAT 0001_08_0310 (3 October 2008)
- Hughes v. Jones & Anor (t/a Graylyns Residential Home)[2008] UKEAT 0159_08_0310 (3 October 2008)
- Pike v Somerset County Council & Anor [2008] UKEAT 0046_08_0310 (3 October 2008)
- Secretary of State for Children Schools & Families v Fletcher [2008] UKEAT 0095_08_3009 (30 September 2008)
- Community Integrated Care Ltd v Smith [2008] UKEAT 0015_08_2309 (23 September 2008)
- Hartlepool Borough Council & Anor v. Dolphin & Ors [2008] UKEAT 0007_08_1509 (15 September 2008)
- GFI Holdings Ltd v Camm [2008] UKEAT 0321_08_1209 (12 September 2008)
- Thornton Print Ltd v.Morton [2008] UKEAT 0090_08_0809 (8 September 2008)
- Ministry of Defence v Botham [2008] UKEAT 0009_08_0109 (1 September 2008)

Usefully Employed - employment law blog by Usefully Employed is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 UK: England & Wales License.
Based on a work at blog.usefullyemployed.co.uk.







1 Responses to “Glass Ceiling”
Leave a Reply