The Times reports that Pinsent Masons is the first law firm to enter Stonewall’s Workplace Equality Index – meaning that it is one of the top 100 employers for gay people. I actually suspect that homophobic discrimination is fairly low in large law firms, and that Pinsents’ placing is more down to a joint initiative between HR & PR than a real representation of different quality of life working there. Money is king in these arenas, and the complete disregard shown for solicitors’ personal life doesn’t depend on who he or she chooses to spend it with. Certainly in my experience a firm will let you get away with any number of personal attributes (positive or otherwise) if you rack up enough hours every month. But similarly, law firms are not the sort of businesses that need to emphasise their diversity policies in order to attract diverse candidates – law has rapidly turned into a profession where women and ethnic and sexual minorities are represented in huge numbers. The lack of these people in senior positions and the judiciary is symptomatic of that rapidity set against the time needed to reach seniority, rather than any glass ceiling.
- This is a blog containing information and commentary on all areas of UK employment law. Please join the debate, and subscribe for regular updates!
-
Recent Posts
Categories
- Absence
- Acas
- Compromise Agreements
- Constructive Dismissal
- Contracts of Employment
- Costs
- Disciplinary
- Discrimination
- Dispute Resolution regulations
- Employment Tribunal
- EU Legislation
- Family Friendly Rights
- Garden Leave
- Grievance
- Health & Safety
- Lawyers
- Limitation Periods
- National Minimum Wage
- Podcasts
- Rambling
- Ramblings
- Recruitment
- Redundancy
- Reinstatement & Re-engagement
- Remedies
- Retirement
- Solicitors
- Status
- The Great Divide
- Trade Unions
- TUPE
- Uncategorized
- Unfair Dismissal
- Usefully Employed
- Working Time Regulations
Latest EAT Judgments- Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v Browne (Race Discrimination : Inferring discrimination) [2011] UKEAT 0294_11_1002 (10 February 2012)
- HM Land Registry v Benson & Ors (Age Discrimination : no sub-topic) [2011] UKEAT 0197_11_1002 (10 February 2012)
- Chelmsford College Corporation v Teal (Jurisdictional Points : Continuity of employment) [2011] UKEAT 0277_11_0701 (7 February 2012)
- Bivonas LLP & Ors v Bennett (Sexual Orientation Discrimination or Transexualism) [2011] UKEAT 0254_11_3101 (31 January 2012)
- Odukwe v The Partners of Hoare Lea Consulting Engineers (Jurisdictional Points : 2002 Act and pre-action requirements) [2012] UKEAT 0547_10_2701 (27 January 2012)
- Amin v Wincanton Group Ltd (Jurisdictional Points : 2002 Act and pre-action requirements) [2011] UKEAT 0508_10_2501 (25 January 2012)
- Nelson v Clapham & Anor (t/a Claphams Solicitors) (Unfair Dismissal : Contributory fault) [2012] UKEAT 0037_11_2401 (24 January 2012)
- Roberts v North West Ambulance Service (Disability Discrimination : Reasonable adjustments) [2011] UKEAT 0085_11_2401 (24 January 2012)
- O' Cathail v Transport For London (Practice and Procedure : Case Management) (Rev 1) [2011] UKEAT 0247_11_1301 (13 January 2012)
- Scottish Ambulance Service v Truslove & Anor (Working Time Regulations) [2012] UKEAT 0028_11_1201 (12 January 2012)
Pingback: “Why the fuck should I work for Pinsent Masons?” « Usefully Employed