<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Usefully (Self)-Employed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.usefullyemployed.co.uk/2008/04/05/usefully-self-employed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.usefullyemployed.co.uk/2008/04/05/usefully-self-employed/</link>
	<description>An Employment Law Blog by a UK barrister</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:55:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louie Barsuhn</title>
		<link>http://blog.usefullyemployed.co.uk/2008/04/05/usefully-self-employed/comment-page-1/#comment-67636</link>
		<dc:creator>Louie Barsuhn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 05:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usefullyemployed.wordpress.com/?p=50#comment-67636</guid>
		<description>I’ve always seen your data helpful. It’s fascinating how that  content is talked about so generally and yet a lot fail to understanding the value in not after which it says.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve always seen your data helpful. It’s fascinating how that  content is talked about so generally and yet a lot fail to understanding the value in not after which it says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delora Covington</title>
		<link>http://blog.usefullyemployed.co.uk/2008/04/05/usefully-self-employed/comment-page-1/#comment-62997</link>
		<dc:creator>Delora Covington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usefullyemployed.wordpress.com/?p=50#comment-62997</guid>
		<description>I appreciate to use great webmaster instruments, these folks assist me to perceive my serp place on search engines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate to use great webmaster instruments, these folks assist me to perceive my serp place on search engines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tempie Rokus</title>
		<link>http://blog.usefullyemployed.co.uk/2008/04/05/usefully-self-employed/comment-page-1/#comment-62243</link>
		<dc:creator>Tempie Rokus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usefullyemployed.wordpress.com/?p=50#comment-62243</guid>
		<description>when i use my whatsmyip handle it does not do the job, do you possess any notion ! but if i kind in localhost it works, when i sort in the ipaddress it struggles to uncover it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when i use my whatsmyip handle it does not do the job, do you possess any notion ! but if i kind in localhost it works, when i sort in the ipaddress it struggles to uncover it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simplywondered</title>
		<link>http://blog.usefullyemployed.co.uk/2008/04/05/usefully-self-employed/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>simplywondered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usefullyemployed.wordpress.com/?p=50#comment-26</guid>
		<description>thanks for answering my impertinent queries. while i&#039;m sure the advice to be quiet is to protect pupils&#039; chance of tenancy (and the fact that in the same position - as i may yet manage to find myself - i would toe the line and shut it) it&#039;s still wrong. shoot the buffers now - it would be a kindness.
and what is it to do with the blasted inns anyway? they exist for their members and not vice versa.
as a professional trainer of some years standing and an actor of more, i am trying to sell my services as advocacy trainer. even suggested a course fees reduction in exchange for my gold dust. and i try to claim that OTHER barristers are arrogant!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for answering my impertinent queries. while i&#8217;m sure the advice to be quiet is to protect pupils&#8217; chance of tenancy (and the fact that in the same position &#8211; as i may yet manage to find myself &#8211; i would toe the line and shut it) it&#8217;s still wrong. shoot the buffers now &#8211; it would be a kindness.<br />
and what is it to do with the blasted inns anyway? they exist for their members and not vice versa.<br />
as a professional trainer of some years standing and an actor of more, i am trying to sell my services as advocacy trainer. even suggested a course fees reduction in exchange for my gold dust. and i try to claim that OTHER barristers are arrogant!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Usefully Employed</title>
		<link>http://blog.usefullyemployed.co.uk/2008/04/05/usefully-self-employed/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Usefully Employed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usefullyemployed.wordpress.com/?p=50#comment-25</guid>
		<description>April pupillage comes from some random thing here (in an anonymous English city that isn&#039;t London) where they take two pupils per year, but at six monthly intervals: I&#039;m starting my first six whilst the last one is starting the second. There&#039;s good and bad - I&#039;ve had problems finding an advocacy course, and the Bar Council talk to me as though I&#039;ve done it just to upset them, but I don&#039;t have that unsettling feeling that my fellow pupil and I are after the same job.

Attitudes towards blogging are changing, Bystander on the Magistrate&#039;s Blog noted recently that when he first started there was a campaign to find and discipline him, and now the MoJ actually links to his site.

In the same way I doubt many barristers / chambers would have a problem with blogging per se, but the fact is that to many old fashioned barristers putting yourself on a platform and airing your views in public simply isn&#039;t done. Attitudes are changing, but a tenancy rests on a simple vote and membership of a chambers will include old buffers who react badly to it.

The recent exhortations to pupils to be quiet may well be born out of anxiety for their chances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>April pupillage comes from some random thing here (in an anonymous English city that isn&#8217;t London) where they take two pupils per year, but at six monthly intervals: I&#8217;m starting my first six whilst the last one is starting the second. There&#8217;s good and bad &#8211; I&#8217;ve had problems finding an advocacy course, and the Bar Council talk to me as though I&#8217;ve done it just to upset them, but I don&#8217;t have that unsettling feeling that my fellow pupil and I are after the same job.</p>
<p>Attitudes towards blogging are changing, Bystander on the Magistrate&#8217;s Blog noted recently that when he first started there was a campaign to find and discipline him, and now the MoJ actually links to his site.</p>
<p>In the same way I doubt many barristers / chambers would have a problem with blogging per se, but the fact is that to many old fashioned barristers putting yourself on a platform and airing your views in public simply isn&#8217;t done. Attitudes are changing, but a tenancy rests on a simple vote and membership of a chambers will include old buffers who react badly to it.</p>
<p>The recent exhortations to pupils to be quiet may well be born out of anxiety for their chances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simply wondered</title>
		<link>http://blog.usefullyemployed.co.uk/2008/04/05/usefully-self-employed/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>simply wondered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usefullyemployed.wordpress.com/?p=50#comment-22</guid>
		<description>what is it about chambers that they want bloggers to stfu? you&#039;d have thought a misunderstood profession like the bar would welcome people being human and giving a bit of insight to the ordinary folk. this is an arrogant body i seem to want to join!
and how come you started pupillage in march/april?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what is it about chambers that they want bloggers to stfu? you&#8217;d have thought a misunderstood profession like the bar would welcome people being human and giving a bit of insight to the ordinary folk. this is an arrogant body i seem to want to join!<br />
and how come you started pupillage in march/april?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Usefully Employed</title>
		<link>http://blog.usefullyemployed.co.uk/2008/04/05/usefully-self-employed/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Usefully Employed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 21:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usefullyemployed.wordpress.com/?p=50#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Thanks as always for the comment - have no fear, I&#039;m already feeling guilty that my number of posts has dropped off a bit of late. I&#039;ll be prioritising posting here (together with some panicked learning of laws that &lt;i&gt;aren&#039;t&lt;/i&gt; to do with employment.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks as always for the comment &#8211; have no fear, I&#8217;m already feeling guilty that my number of posts has dropped off a bit of late. I&#8217;ll be prioritising posting here (together with some panicked learning of laws that <i>aren&#8217;t</i> to do with employment.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nearly Legal</title>
		<link>http://blog.usefullyemployed.co.uk/2008/04/05/usefully-self-employed/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Nearly Legal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 17:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usefullyemployed.wordpress.com/?p=50#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Good luck and I hope it goes wonderfully. Completely understand the &#039;no pupillage blogging&#039; rule, but I hope you keep the blog going. We haven&#039;t got enough good substantive/practice law blogs to lose one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck and I hope it goes wonderfully. Completely understand the &#8216;no pupillage blogging&#8217; rule, but I hope you keep the blog going. We haven&#8217;t got enough good substantive/practice law blogs to lose one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

