Strike out

Croke v Leeds City Council [2008] UKEAT 0512_07_2905 is a good example of a Tribunal’s decision to strike out (without hearing evidence) a discrimination case which had no reasonable prospect of success being upheld. A strike out is a draconian step for any tribunal to take, as it effectively prevents the Claimant having a full hearing of his complaint. Here the Employment Judge was clear that the facts as pleaded by the Claimant would not engage the laws which he claims to enforce. As a result he didn’t even hear formal evidence from the Claimant, although he did engage in a “long discussion” with him to see if he could unearth even a hint of a possible claim. It’s good to see the EAT upholding both the pragmatic conduct of the hearing, and the decision itself, as in a costs free environment such as the ET meritless claims are still a huge burden on the Respondent.

Share this post:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
This entry was posted in Discrimination, Employment Tribunal and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>