<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Costs orders in favour of non-lawyers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.usefullyemployed.co.uk/2008/08/17/costs-orders-in-favour-of-non-lawyers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.usefullyemployed.co.uk/2008/08/17/costs-orders-in-favour-of-non-lawyers/</link>
	<description>An Employment Law Blog by a UK barrister</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Usefully Employed</title>
		<link>http://blog.usefullyemployed.co.uk/2008/08/17/costs-orders-in-favour-of-non-lawyers/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>Usefully Employed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usefullyemployed.co.uk/?p=114#comment-328</guid>
		<description>OK, but you only get my non-researched answer. Dealing with it in the wrong order:

Self-employment - Legal execs can work in any field when employed by solicitors. They have increasing rights of audience, and the blur between FILEX and solicitors is blurring - they either can, or will shortly, be able to join in partnership with solicitors. Legal execs can be in business on their own account and deal with the public - but only for unregulated activity. I'm not quite sure what that means without looking, but likely no civil/criminal/family litigation, conveyancing, probate or property. Employment is a maybe, as it's unregulated, but query if MoJ claims handling regulation is then required for Claimant work.

Costs - Work done by legal execs employed by solicitors is recoverable in assessment in the County / High Court, albeit not necessarily at the upper rates. There's therefore an interesting question on whether a firm of legal execs only would be entitled to costs on assessment of a tribunal claim. I suggest you read the case above and Agassi, and come to a (researched) conclusion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, but you only get my non-researched answer. Dealing with it in the wrong order:</p>
<p>Self-employment - Legal execs can work in any field when employed by solicitors. They have increasing rights of audience, and the blur between FILEX and solicitors is blurring - they either can, or will shortly, be able to join in partnership with solicitors. Legal execs can be in business on their own account and deal with the public - but only for unregulated activity. I&#8217;m not quite sure what that means without looking, but likely no civil/criminal/family litigation, conveyancing, probate or property. Employment is a maybe, as it&#8217;s unregulated, but query if MoJ claims handling regulation is then required for Claimant work.</p>
<p>Costs - Work done by legal execs employed by solicitors is recoverable in assessment in the County / High Court, albeit not necessarily at the upper rates. There&#8217;s therefore an interesting question on whether a firm of legal execs only would be entitled to costs on assessment of a tribunal claim. I suggest you read the case above and Agassi, and come to a (researched) conclusion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blog.usefullyemployed.co.uk/2008/08/17/costs-orders-in-favour-of-non-lawyers/#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usefullyemployed.co.uk/?p=114#comment-322</guid>
		<description>I'd hate you to think that I'm too slack to carry out my own research on the issue (even though I am!) but what is the costs position of a Legal Executive working for a law firm? 

Which makes me wonder... can a Legal Exec be a Legal Exec if s/he doesn't work for a law firm?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d hate you to think that I&#8217;m too slack to carry out my own research on the issue (even though I am!) but what is the costs position of a Legal Executive working for a law firm? </p>
<p>Which makes me wonder&#8230; can a Legal Exec be a Legal Exec if s/he doesn&#8217;t work for a law firm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
