Monthly Archives: January 2009

Barack Obama

I’m not American, and I’m not black, so I don’t really understand why I, like many others, felt genuinely emotional at President Obama’s inauguration. I think we all claim a piece of him – whether you’ve simply despaired at the … Continue reading

Posted in Rambling | 1 Comment

Pre-pack administration: good or bad for employment figures?

Most employment practitioners will have dealt with redundancies and TUPE issues following a company going into administration. This week’s File on 4 was an interesting look at whether the current insolvency regime might not be counter-productive in the current downturn. … Continue reading

Posted in Redundancy, TUPE | 2 Comments

Maternity leave and pay – a summary of the current law

This article, written by yours truly, first appeared in the December / January issue of Independent Lawyer. On 5th October legislation changed some aspects of maternity law, and in particular harmonised employee benefits and entitlements during Additional Maternity Leave (AML) … Continue reading

Posted in Discrimination, Family Friendly Rights | 14 Comments

Working time opt-out at death’s door once more

Personnel Today reports on the alarm expressed by businesses on the European Parliament’s vote to end the maximum working week opt-out. The statistics quoted are telling enough as to how its end would effect the UK workforce – around 1 … Continue reading

Posted in Contracts of Employment, Rambling, Working Time Regulations | 3 Comments

Court of Appeal rules homophobic harrassment not dependent on perceived sexuality

In March the EAT ruled that Mr English, a straight man whose colleagues knew full well he was straight, was not harrassed within the Employment Equality (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2003 when his colleagues subjected him to homophobic abuse. My blog post … Continue reading

Posted in Discrimination | Leave a comment

BNP Membership – employment law aspects

I’m still playing catch-up, but the leak of a BNP membership list was immediately dissected by curious employers, and the media, for the presence of police officers, teachers and similar public servants. I’m willing to bet at least a few … Continue reading

Posted in Discrimination | Leave a comment