Riam Dean wins disability claim against Abercrombie & Fitch

Riam Dean’s disability discrimination claim against Abercrombie & Fitch alleged that she had been pulled from the shop floor back to the stockroom: her prosthetic arm didn’t accord with the company’s “look” policy.

The tribunal has found in her favour today, finding harrassment and failure to make reasonable adjustments. See the full circumstances of the caseat the link above. Miss Dean was awarded £7,800 for injury to feelings, £1,077.37 for loss of earnings, and £137.75 for (presumably) an unfair dismissal basic award.

Decisions such as this are almost run of the mill for A&F. The company has hit the headlines in the US for banishing a Dallas employee to the stockroom for scoring a zero in the the company’s “hierarchy of hotness”, and in 2004 it settled a class action lawsuit from ethnic minorities accusing it of discrimination in employment and in its marketing materials. The New York Times reported:

Eduardo Gonzalez, the lead plaintiff and a senior chemistry major at Stanford University, said that when he applied to an Abercrombie store in Santa Clara, Calif., managers urged him to apply for the overnight stocking crew. Noting that his application was rejected, he said that when a store manager interviewed him and 13 other applicants at once, the manager overwhelmingly favored the two white applicants.

In an unusual step, the settlement calls for Abercrombie to increase diversity not just in hiring and promotions, but also in its advertisements and catalogs, which have long featured models who were overwhelmingly white and who seemed to have stepped off the football field or out of fraternities or sororities. Plaintiffs’ lawyers said they insisted that the company agree to add more diversity to its marketing materials so as not to discourage minorities from applying for jobs.

Wondering about that today I visited Abercombie.com, and looked at the Picture Gallery. All ten models are white. The same goes for the images on the ‘Mens’, ‘Womens’ and ‘Jeans’. In fact, to find a single ethnic minority you have to head over to their Kids website, where both teenage models featured are of Asian origin. Given that the shots on the main site are all half-naked, and all sexually suggestive, and the teens are (understandably) head/shoulders fully clothed shots, you can’t help wonder at Abercrombie’s boldness at segregating their minorities into the ‘cute’ rather than ‘sexy’ categories. For more invective about this vile organisation see Charon QC’s post back in June. All one can really do is hope that this whole experience has served Riam Dean well in her quest to become a lawyer.

And just for fun, check out the Top 11 diversity photoshop disasters.

Share this post:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
This entry was posted in Discrimination, Employment Tribunal and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Riam Dean wins disability claim against Abercrombie & Fitch

  1. Usefully Employed says:

    Abercrombie & Fitch have now released a statement:

    As to the Judgment of the Employment Tribunal, released 11 August, 2009, David Cupps, General Counsel of Abercrombie & Fitch said, “We are pleased that the Tribunal found that A&F did not discriminate against Ms. Dean on grounds of her disability and also found that A&F provided Ms. Dean with the accommodation she requested. While the Tribunal did make a finding of failure to accommodate and harassment, that finding was based on the events of a single day – - events which were not at all representative of Ms. Dean’s overall employment with A&F. We continue to believe that these events resulted from a misunderstanding that could have been avoided by better communication on the part of both parties.

    We were happy to employ Ms. Dean, and we have always been, and will continue to be, supportive of the rights of disabled individuals.”

    Jaw-dropping.

  2. Pingback: Posts about disability discrimination (best posts combined for review) as of August 14, 2009 | Discrimination Law News

  3. Pingback: Abercrombie & Fitch told to pay disabled worker Riam Dean £9,000 « Charon QC

  4. lawminx says:

    Do NOT get me started on these LUDICROUS body fascists.

    Supportive of the rights of disabled individuals?

    My EYE.

  5. Pingback: 15th August: Postcard from LA LA Land… « Charon QC

  6. white rabbit says:

    Why is it that whenever some commercial outfit gets well busted they always claim it is a ‘misunderstanding’?

    Oh no it’s not!

    We understand all too well.

  7. Steaming says:

    This murder verdict was based on the bludgeon-related events of a single day – - events which were not at all representative of our many happy years together.

  8. Usefully Employed says:

    white rabbit – Makes you cross doesn’t it? You still feel like they’re trying to say “but we’re misunderstood. Poor us.”

    Steaming – You’re funny and A&F are weasels.

    Minx – we’ve never met, but you’ll always be at the top of my hierarchy of hotness

  9. Pingback: An extreme, corporatist view of employment law

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>